Toysdaily 玩具日報

 找回密碼
 註冊
樓主: Vince

[最新報價] 千值練 天威勇士 無敵鐵甲人 (#203 updated video 介紹)

[複製鏈接]
發表於 23-7-2017 09:48:14 | 顯示全部樓層
所以非笨大出品,我會睇完玩評才考慮,講真我玩了十幾年超金金魂從未出事。笨大我有信心D,GX39R 我訂了。

發表於 23-7-2017 10:17:29 來自手機 | 顯示全部樓層
Crack liners have no issue as it is a plastic toys, but the design of transformation ( or say integration) does not meet the expectation nowadays: it needs to pull off parts? Probably that's the reason why they do not demonstrate the transformation before on sale...
發表於 23-7-2017 10:20:24 來自手機 | 顯示全部樓層
柴灣20座男孩 發表於 23-7-2017 09:48 AM
所以非笨大出品,我會睇完玩評才考慮,講真我玩了十幾年超金金魂從未出事。笨大我有信心D,GX39R 我訂了。
...

Yes, agree with you. At least Bandai
Chogokin makes a good balance between fun (playing without hassle) and display.
發表於 23-7-2017 11:12:22 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 genesicgaogaiga 於 23-7-2017 11:13 AM 編輯
百鬼咁夜行 發表於 23-7-2017 10:20 AM
Yes, agree with you. At least Bandai
Chogokin makes a good balance between fun (playing without ha ...

After manipulating the toy for a while, it gave me a feel of model or SHE  instead of a chokin. Besides the metallic joints are only  interconnected with screws.They can be easily adjusted with screw driver, just like I was playing a studio Half Eye toy. I think it may be looseed after standing for period of time like SHE. It is just an enlarged size SHE but SHE will never detach anything. I am not happy with this design too. Sentinel, what are you doing ???
發表於 23-7-2017 11:19:45 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 HakiRyu 於 23-7-2017 12:30 PM 編輯
百鬼咁夜行 發表於 23-7-2017 10:17 AM
Crack liners have no issue as it is a plastic toys, but the design of transformation ( or say integr ...

That's your definition of expectation? You got to be kidding. Have you ever seen the garbage combination robots Evolution Toys produce? NOW THAT doesn't meet any standard I tell you. I don't see why pulling out a pair of arms is any hassle, you can still 'use it'. The key here is that you pull out the arms and you can 'put it back' and NOT pull them out and NOT use them at all. There is a big difference there. There is no question that Bandai produces good toys. However, in my opinion, they really screwed up with the design of GX-39 Baikanfu and GX-39R too. If not, my money would have gone to them instead. Nothing is perfect, learn to appreciate other choices out there. People had high expectations with Sentinel and their Baikanfu; and when the final product/toy is different from their 'regular Bandai release/collection'.... people start to 'compare' and then 'complain'. It is a still a new company after all. I don't see what's wrong with the new concept, the new way of combining. In the toy market today, it's good to see some new ideas. Saying all that, the only thing I am not backing up Sentinel this time is their QC. One member in here had scratches all over his Baikanfu and the customer service gave him a lame reply.
發表於 23-7-2017 14:00:57 來自手機 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 hero222 於 23-7-2017 02:02 PM 編輯

雖然我未買,但都唔想千值執,冇左強勁既對手,笨大會不思進取的!
發表於 23-7-2017 14:22:08 | 顯示全部樓層
HakiRyu 發表於 23-7-2017 11:19 AM
That's your definition of expectation? You got to be kidding. Have you ever seen the garbage combin ...

千值死忠果然係盲既........

點評

Funny man XD  發表於 23-7-2017 02:58 PM
發表於 23-7-2017 14:31:02 | 顯示全部樓層
百鬼咁夜行 發表於 23-7-2017 10:17 AM
Crack liners have no issue as it is a plastic toys, but the design of transformation ( or say integr ...

笨大十幾年前出既都唔使拆手,千記呢次真係趕客
發表於 23-7-2017 14:35:06 | 顯示全部樓層
hero222 發表於 23-7-2017 02:00 PM
雖然我未買,但都唔想千值執,冇左強勁既對手,笨大會不思進取的!

最終問題係消費者,出咩垃圾都有因話咩買回回憶去買,咩磁石波垃圾,咩斷手合體,改到除咗個名之外唔似金剛既金剛都有人仆去比錢.......
頭像被屏蔽
發表於 23-7-2017 14:51:17 | 顯示全部樓層
提示: 該帖被管理員或版主屏蔽
發表於 23-7-2017 14:56:24 來自手機 | 顯示全部樓層
eddiem249 發表於 23-7-2017 02:22 PM
千值死忠果然係盲既........

It's fine. Everyone has his/her own view. That's why we have the forum and share views :) .

如果不作比較,那消費者又有何以作出選擇?尤其這個的定價為約四萬日圓,大家分享多點看法,對未買的同好也算是多一點參考。

點評

You are right. We all have our own views that is why the forum is for. No hard feelings on what I said, but some people's views are really ridiculous. (Not yours)  發表於 23-7-2017 02:59 PM
發表於 23-7-2017 15:22:55 | 顯示全部樓層
件貨出左街得唔得市場自有公論,唔係一個人打十個就代表有道理
發表於 23-7-2017 17:06:23 來自手機 | 顯示全部樓層
有日本或兩岸的開箱帖了嗎?唉...太離譜了!這次千記有乜理由會將天威勇士設計到咁!?外形唔似就算!!依家合體仲要拆拳拆肩拆手臂!?點會咁架!?設計失誤?還是太少人訂成本控制番轉頭呀!?唉....
發表於 23-7-2017 17:08:16 | 顯示全部樓層
Gainax 發表於 23-7-2017 03:22 PM
件貨出左街得唔得市場自有公論,唔係一個人打十個就代表有道理

或者真係會有死忠一個人買10隻翻屋企玩呢
發表於 23-7-2017 18:13:54 | 顯示全部樓層
zakkee57 發表於 23-7-2017 02:51 PM
咪係, 重要搬Evolution依間垃圾黎比較. 個合體設計跟本ON9. 隻嘢重要唔平.

comparing withevolution is not fair. Evolution QC and non sense design are both ridiculous.
QC is 100% none.
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|Toysdaily 玩具日報

GMT+8, 25-11-2024 06:02 AM , Processed in 0.064702 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表