Toysdaily 玩具日報

 找回密碼
 註冊
查看: 5148|回復: 10

一個低B問題....

[複製鏈接]
發表於 28-2-2008 16:09:42 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
那些鏡是EF-S鏡皇,大三元及小三元? thanks
發表於 28-2-2008 16:15:57 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 hathaway 於 28-2-2008 04:09 PM 發表
那些鏡是EF-S鏡皇,大三元及小三元? thanks



EF-S鏡皇就不知了...

大三元...通常指...

Canon EF16-35mm F/2.8L USM
Canon EF24-70mm F/2.8L USM
Canon EF70-200mm F/2.8L USM (或 EF70-200mm F/2.8L IS USM )


小三元...就會係...

Canon EF17-40mm F/4L USM
Canon EF24-105mm F/4L IS USM
Canon EF70-200mm F/4L USM (或 EF70-200mm F/4L IS USM )

「大三」與「小三」...只是 f2.8 與 f4 之分別...

小櫻上
 樓主| 發表於 28-2-2008 16:35:36 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 小櫻 於 28-2-2008 04:15 PM 發表



EF-S鏡皇就不知了...

大三元...通常指...

Canon EF16-35mm F/2.8L USM
Canon EF24-70mm F/2.8L USM
Canon EF70-200mm F/2.8L USM (或 EF70-200mm F/2.8L IS USM )


小三元...就會係...

Canon E ...

Thankyou!
發表於 28-2-2008 17:54:55 | 顯示全部樓層
樓主
無話鏡皇唔鏡皇.....
味停產....1200L......但買唔起無唔著
24-70L係135菲林時.....攞出黎己經殺晒....依家1.6X年代 C.S. cal鏡常客.....
鏡皇....真係會用/負擔得起就夠.....
小弟只用
17-40....風景
50 1.4....影bb
100-400...生態
100macro.....玩具...........足夠啦
發表於 28-2-2008 17:58:14 | 顯示全部樓層
:34:  EF-S 鏡皇應該係指  17-55/2.8 IS 啦,變形,sharpness都一流, F2.8 有 IS , 係色淡咗小小~~~ :71:
發表於 28-2-2008 18:03:44 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 shawn 於 28-2-2008 05:58 PM 發表
:34:  EF-S 鏡皇應該係指  17-55/2.8 IS 啦,變形,sharpness都一流, F2.8 有 IS , 係色淡咗小小~~~ :71:


EF-S係咪只可1.6x用個d鏡???......是否小弟會錯意........
發表於 28-2-2008 18:08:48 | 顯示全部樓層
樓主大....
抱歉.....睇錯EF鏡.....Sorry:64:
自收.........
發表於 4-3-2008 08:34:16 | 顯示全部樓層
from 小三元...就會係...

Canon EF17-40mm F/4L USM
Canon EF24-105mm F/4L IS USM
Canon EF70-200mm F/4L USM (或 EF70-200mm F/4L IS USM )

i have the 1st and 3rd,  probably will not get the 2nd:56: :56:

still undecide if I want to get the 100 macro:34: :34:

also from warmblood post
50mm F1.4 for BB,  is that a little too close (if it is 1.6X,  I am using 40D):52: :52:

cause my friend get a sigma 30mm F1.4:43:
發表於 4-3-2008 14:02:56 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 Vaio 於 4-3-2008 08:34 AM 發表
from 小三元...就會係...

Canon EF17-40mm F/4L USM
Canon EF24-105mm F/4L IS USM
Canon EF70-200mm F/4L USM (或 EF70-200mm F/4L IS USM )

i have the 1st and 3rd,  probably will not get the 2nd:56:  ...


小弟都唔係咁好意思回......自己睇錯野答錯晒...完全誤導樓主......

咁閣下提出50 1.4的問題.....試下回....當我吹下水...九噏下好啦....

咁每個人都有佢自己一套的影相方法....50 1.4作為0~1歲的bb我覺得(我覺得)係好....有人抱住 (佢離4/5呎....屋企有開燈...加高少少ISO...搞掂..已會有一張大頭連口水堅的相.(bb相無係身...老狗一只....無用閃...原相無crop...)





相反...如用30...我會(只係我會....因受習性牽引)影都一張大頭怪嬰相........閃....
發表於 4-3-2008 14:36:42 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 Vaio 於 4-3-2008 08:34 AM 發表
from 小三元...就會係...

Canon EF17-40mm F/4L USM
Canon EF24-105mm F/4L IS USM
Canon EF70-200mm F/4L USM (或 EF70-200mm F/4L IS USM )

i have the 1st and 3rd,  probably will not get the 2nd:56:  ...


40D + 50/1.4 影BB梗 ok 啦:73:  上一張 5D+85/1.8 大大你睇睇,個焦距應該差唔多:52:

發表於 5-3-2008 02:04:20 | 顯示全部樓層
Thanks for the sample from both Shawn and Warmblood!

The reason I am asking, is because the 50mm x1.6,  will that be too close,  I have a 85mm F1.8 myself too.  Someone mention if I want a standard 50mm in FF,  use it in 1.6x, should get something between 28 to 35mm

another reason is the baby is coming,  so may be want the best option for them!  (they!!!!):70: :70: :70: :70: :59: :59: :59: :59:
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|Toysdaily 玩具日報

GMT+8, 20-5-2024 07:07 AM , Processed in 0.224464 second(s), 20 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表