|
發表於 4-9-2009 10:04:05
|
顯示全部樓層
原帖由 呂品器 於 4-9-2009 09:50 AM 發表 
講QC... 其實係單VF-0A爆手野(基本上係必斷)爆左大鑊... :26:
講上色同其他問題,有冇髹過界呀,左左手呀,爛其他野呀果d都好似唔覺 (不論1/48 VF-1定1/60 VF-0)
同埋VF-0天生個design係粗壯d既... 飛機m ...
:71: Yes, you are right. But the "finishing" of 0A/S is quite raw in my opinion (sorry, I don't know how to explain in English:26: ) i.e. not as "clean and tidy" as 1/48 and 1/60 did.
Actually, one of my darlings I visited at vegetable stall last evening is 0A :love: (I already got the Shin ver but heart c c to buy one ordinary ver). Through the box window, I could see the gaps between parts in 0A (as in my Shin ver) are not as tight and fit as in 1/48 and 1/60. Maybe, the design of VF-1 is more simple.
Just wish to share with Brother Elvis some different views in view of his tight budget.:64:
[ 本帖最後由 F-14 於 4-9-2009 10:21 AM 編輯 ] |
|