小弟終於入左DSLR大家庭

warxv · 發表於 26-2-2008 09:58:04

恭喜晒!
果然係大家庭,一開始就已經有咁多成員了.
不過仲基本成員仲差廣角同tele,快d考慮下啦,70~200 2.8 IS USM絕對是不二之選,不過真係要考慮重量,試用過半日真係會用到手震的.

小櫻 · 發表於 26-2-2008 10:06:48

原帖由 hathaway 於 26-2-2008 09:00 AM 發表

用於影玩具!

增距鏡影玩具？...:50:

雖然都影到...但係閣下是否搞錯「增距鏡」與「近攝環」的分別呢？

小櫻上

hathaway · 發表於 26-2-2008 11:35:03

原帖由小櫻於 26-2-2008 10:06 AM 發表

增距鏡影玩具？...:50:

雖然都影到...但係閣下是否搞錯「增距鏡」與「近攝環」的分別呢？

小櫻上

由於小弟放柔光箱既位置問題, 距離放到腳架既位置有成尺遠, 開盡50mm(x1.6後=80mm)都重影到D邊位, 唯有用增距鏡

hathaway · 發表於 26-2-2008 11:38:39

原帖由 warxv 於 26-2-2008 09:58 AM 發表
恭喜晒!
果然係大家庭,一開始就已經有咁多成員了.
不過仲基本成員仲差廣角同tele,快d考慮下啦,70~200 2.8 IS USM絕對是不二之選,不過真係要考慮重量,試用過半日真係會用到手震的.

大光圈廣角仲未有心水, 可唔可以推介小弟? 支70-200仲save緊錢(最平都8XXX.....)

Vaio · 發表於 26-2-2008 15:05:30

Based on your price quote,  seems you are target for the non IS version

by a happy owner of 70-200 F4L IS and probably soon will add the 100mm F2.8 Macro

原帖由 hathaway 於 25-2-2008 08:38 PM 發表大光圈廣角仲未有心水, 可唔可以推介小弟? 支70-200仲save緊錢(最平都8XXX.....)

hathaway · 發表於 26-2-2008 15:26:40

原帖由 Vaio 於 26-2-2008 03:05 PM 發表
Based on your price quote, seems you are target for the non IS version

by a happy owner of 70-200 F4L IS and probably soon will add the 100mm F2.8 Macro

As you may know, IS verson is $4000 more.....
But, for all the report I had read, there's not much different in between......
100mm F2.8 Marco, Within $4000, it's a buget buy!

shawn · 發表於 26-2-2008 15:53:03

原帖由 hathaway 於 26-2-2008 09:01 AM 發表

澳門近二千....

:50: 澳門d o野都幾貴,唔怪得新聞話通脹勁過香港,上次陪fd o係天祥買40D,個sales哥哥問要唔要跟支lensbaby,連body(40d)買計我地$950咁話,不過我都叫我個fd唔好,佢啱啱玩,setup同大大都差唔多,lensbaby咁難用佢一定舞唔掂:55: ,我都係幫佢揀咗 EF50/1.8 , sigma 18-50/2.8 同 sigma 70-300(o個時canon未出55-250IS,一出佢就買鬼咗:68: )幫佢揀sigma 而捨 A16 係知佢要型要大碌,tamron外型膠膠地佢一定唔鍾意,而且焦外散景小弟都比較buy sigma 多少少:77:

hathaway · 發表於 26-2-2008 16:24:26

原帖由 shawn 於 26-2-2008 03:53 PM 發表

:50: 澳門d o野都幾貴,唔怪得新聞話通脹勁過香港,上次陪fd o係天祥買40D,個sales哥哥問要唔要跟支lensbaby,連body(40d)買計我地$950咁話,不過我都叫我個fd唔好,佢啱啱玩,setup同大大都差唔多,lensba ...

2.0都$1500! 原本都係想買A16, 不過試過之後都係鐘意支死馬多D!

Vaio · 發表於 27-2-2008 14:45:36

in US, canon 100mm F2.8 macro is about US$440
and my 70-200 F4L IS is about US$1000

hathaway · 發表於 27-2-2008 15:52:42

原帖由 Vaio 於 27-2-2008 02:45 PM 發表
in US, canon 100mm F2.8 macro is about US$440
and my 70-200 F4L IS is about US$1000

Just qoute from shop, IS version HK $8200, without HK $5400.....

聖鬥士星矢 · 發表於 27-2-2008 19:20:11

A16有咩唔好.....................
我等緊A16II...................希望到時唔好咁貴

Vaio · 發表於 28-2-2008 02:02:52

it depends,  some people like the F2.8

However,  some people don't like the noisy motor (not USM), and then the ring is reverse direction compare to the Canon's

I almost bought it but then decide to get the 17-40 F4L

as a lot of big bro said, everyone has their own preference,  if you test it and like it, go for it. There is always a lens that will match your need!  

for myself,  I always like sigma too,  but really also look into the Tamaron 90mm Macro. 

原帖由 聖鬥士星矢 於 27-2-2008 04:20 AM 發表 A16有咩唔好.....................我等緊A16II...................希望到時唔好咁貴

shawn · 發表於 28-2-2008 02:26:41

原帖由 Vaio 於 28-2-2008 02:02 AM 發表
it depends,  some people like the F2.8

However,  some people don't like the noisy motor (not USM), and then the ring is reverse direction compare to the Canon's

I almost bought it but  ...

:58: 咦~~ 小弟又係幾鍾意 Sigma 架喎,貪佢好多焦段原廠都無提供同埋變形控制良好~~:73:

billyko · 發表於 28-2-2008 12:54:45

原帖由 聖鬥士星矢 於 27-2-2008 07:20 PM 發表
A16有咩唔好.....................
我等緊A16II...................希望到時唔好咁貴

:? 會出2代??

shawn · 發表於 17-3-2008 12:28:58

原帖由 聖鬥士星矢 於 27-2-2008 07:20 PM 發表
A16有咩唔好.....................
我等緊A16II...................希望到時唔好咁貴

http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=478041&extra=page%3D1

:80: A16 II