原帖由 andykkfung 於 5-6-2009 02:30 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
其實係, F-14搭載能力比起現役係差好多, 同埋致命o既係先天設計有問題, 令到維修成本高所以先至停產, 咁樣被迫退役, :42:
As the global political atmosphere has changed, US Navy do not need designated Fighters to protect carriers.Instead, multi-function warplanes (like F/A-18E/F) are more suitable for modern coastal wars.(Moreover, building multi-purpose warplanes could easily get the budget from politicians with less criticisms.)As Big Big rightly pointed out, when comparing with the lower development cost of F/A-18E/F (modified from F/A-18C/D), the high maintenance cost (for a warplane over 20 years old) of F-14 is one of the main reasons of its retirement.:64:
[ 本帖最後由 F-14 於 5-6-2009 05:55 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 ekim11 於 5-6-2009 02:36 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
好看不好用...:58:
One interesting thing is that, during its some 20 years' service, F-14s have only a few records of real fight with enemies (excluding those classified records, if any, of course).Someone said that it is attributed to its long range air-to-air missiles (the Phoenix) and radar i.e. enemies are already "locked" and threatened:69:by F-14s' radars at long distance:^when they are getting close to US carriers, and therefore retreated before real contact.However, for the politicians, they do not accept this explanation :67: and thought that the achievements/effectiveness of F-14s are low in the light of its high maintenance cost.:78:
[ 本帖最後由 F-14 於 5-6-2009 05:50 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 F-14 於 5-6-2009 03:14 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
One interesting thing is that, during its some 20 years' service, F-14s have only a few records of real fight with enemies (excluding those classified records, if any, of course).Someone said th ...
Tell those stupid guys to see Topgun, just kidding.
Lately I bought several 1/200 F-14 (A/B/D) which are of very detailed with insigna painted, very good when displayed with those 1/200 VFs
原帖由 呂品器 於 3-6-2009 08:11 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
油麻地 in's point :64:
1 比 60 Destroid Tomahawk 〔普通版)那裏有得買???
請問那一間??可否告訴小弟,唔該師兄!!!:64:
[ 本帖最後由 kentjui 於 5-6-2009 04:06 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 Shiro 於 5-6-2009 01:35 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Looks like many Dai Dais like F-14!Here is the REAL thing...
http://i688.photobucket.com/albums/vv249/toyotaslave/F-14.jpg
Sorry for my ugly face....
http://i688.photobucket.com/albums/vv249/toyo ... :shiny: :shiny: , not ugly ah !! :78:
原帖由 andykkfung 於 5-6-2009 01:40 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
F-14 個設計真係靚到無朋友, 到而家我覺得F-14 靚過現役美軍戰機 yes, i feel this a lot of years la !! :71:
原帖由 ekim11 於 5-6-2009 02:41 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
http://www.mahq.net/mecha/macross/modelgraphix/vf-1j-high-fighter.jpg :@ :ice:
原帖由 ekim11 於 5-6-2009 02:42 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
http://www.mahq.net/mecha/macross/modelgraphix/vf-1j-svc-8-battroid.jpg%3Ca%20href=http://www.mahq.net/mecha/macross/modelgraphix/vf-1j-svc-8-fighter.jpg" border="0"> :shiny: :shiny: :handshake: :handshake:
原帖由 Panzer 於 5-6-2009 03:39 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Tell those stupid guys to see Topgun, just kidding.
Lately I bought several 1/200 F-14 (A/B/D) which are of very detailed with insigna painted, very good when displayed with those 1/200 VFs
Panzer Big Big, if you like 1/72 diecast F-14, followings are recommended to you::64:
http://www.centurywings.com/model_72.html
They are really solid!:35:
原帖由 F-14 於 5-6-2009 04:38 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Panzer Big Big, if you like 1/72 diecast F-14, followings are recommended to you::64:
http://www.centurywings.com/model_72.html
They are really solid!:35:
Very nice, I will try if I can spare some space, thx. In the meantime, I can only stock the 1/200s (Horgan Wings)
http://www.bigthunder.jp/product42.asp?Bun2ID=403107 :56:
原帖由 Panzer 於 5-6-2009 05:27 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Very nice, I will try if I can spare some space, thx. In the meantime, I can only stock the 1/200s (Horgan Wings)
http://www.bigthunder.jp/product42.asp?Bun2ID=403107 :56:
It's really great idea to put 1/200 F-14 with VF-25 side by side!:shiny: Moreover, there are plenty of choices wor....Let me think think it sin....
原帖由 andykkfung 於 5-6-2009 01:40 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
F-14 個設計真係靚到無朋友, 到而家我覺得F-14 靚過現役美軍戰機
Agree!!!!!:handshake:
原帖由 F-14 於 5-6-2009 04:38 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Panzer Big Big, if you like 1/72 diecast F-14, followings are recommended to you::64:
http://www.centurywings.com/model_72.html
They are really solid!:35:
Thank you so much! A very good site!!!!:$
原帖由 holimw 於 5-6-2009 06:23 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Thank you so much! A very good site!!!!:$
X 2
Thx brother ! :64:
原帖由 ginnytyson 於 5-6-2009 09:31 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
我的大部份 VF-1J 收藏 + 少量玩具分享
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j114/ginnytyson/20090605147.jpg
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j114/ginnytyson/20090605126.jpg
http://i78.photobucket.com/a ...
:@ 勁呀!:71:正到暈! :77: