原帖由 CASS001 於 10-4-2009 01:12 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
係未太近影但部機又冇Macro 呀?
Thanks 先 :64:
唔係太近... (廿cm左右以上)亦都有試過微距/普通...
原帖由 呂品器 於 10-4-2009 03:49 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
先thanks回應 :64:
1. 我冇近成咁...十幾cm點都有...
2. 我係用兩秒自拍既... (加腳架)
唔知燈光影響有幾大？我屋企個影相位，果邊廳有光管，有水晶燈，不過試過3種combination，出黎都係矇矇地......
先確定相機已經對到焦....試吓用兩秒以上嘅自拍....盡量唔好咁大動作去影響到架相機同腳架...
夠光當然會好好多....免去因長時間捕光而意外造成嘅不必要震動....
原帖由 MAX 於 10-4-2009 04:09 PM 發表 images/common/back.gif
先確定相機已經對到焦....試吓用兩秒以上嘅自拍....盡量唔好咁大動作去影響到架相機同腳架...
夠光當然會好好多....免去因長時間捕光而意外造成嘅不必要震動....
Thanks :64:
咁我試下用10秒...
基本上部機可以set既野，唔同combinations 我試過過百個...
想請問，家居光管其實ok唔ok呢？
不過其家我又試過加支檯燈射住，但只係光左，矇既問題都冇咩改進 (打落白色位仲矇多d)，顏色仲冇咁靚添
[ 本帖最後由 呂品器 於 10-4-2009 04:40 PM 編輯 ]
例如呢幅...
http://i472.photobucket.com/albums/rr89/ff95gj/4906e4f9.jpg
- 冇resize/retouch 過
- ISO80
- 腳架、自拍10秒
- 25cm遠，「普通」距離setting
- 純粹光管光
- AiAF
- 1200x1600像
點解睇落都係有d矇架呢？大大果d好crispy架啵！:55:
Thanks 各位賜教 :64:
:he:tq tq
Thanks for the great info!
十萬個多謝:71: :71:
原帖由 呂品器 於 10-4-2009 07:01 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
例如呢幅...
http://i472.photobucket.com/albums/rr89/ff95gj/4906e4f9.jpg
- 冇resize/retouch 過
- ISO80
- 腳架、自拍10秒
- 25cm遠，「普通」距離setting
- 純粹光管光
- AiAF
- 1200x1600像
點解 ...
會唔會個鏡頭有漬...:x
原帖由 呂品器 於 10-4-2009 19:01 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
例如呢幅...
- 冇resize/retouch 過
- ISO80
- 腳架、自拍10秒
- 25cm遠，「普通」距離setting
- 純粹光管光
- AiAF
- 1200x1600像
點解 ...
U dun follow my advise after read wor:55:... 2 major defects
1) AIAF <- wrong!:53: so the focal point is not on the head! use single pt focus & focus on the head
2) no background paper :80:(in fact, white bkg is quite difficult to handle, try using some bkg paper of other color)
原帖由 dogjumpjump 於 10-4-2009 10:20 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
所以你話超越DSLR, 又好似水分高咗D
see the last point in my blog abt zero focal lenngth macro :)
頂！:he:
原帖由 Gundam@EFSF 於 11-4-2009 12:48 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
U dun follow my advise after read wor:55:... 2 major defects
1) AIAF <- wrong!:53: so the focal point is not on the head! use single pt focus & focus on the head
2) no background paper :80:(in fact, white bkg is quite difficult to handle, try using some bkg paper of other color)
師兄：多謝提點先！
1.笨問題：我部傻瓜機得AiAF、中央對焦同臉部優先...咁即係揀中央對焦？:( 希望師兄唔好嘔血...細佬真係唔曉...
2.平時有用黑畫紙做底，上面幅野係求快所以冇用到，不過矇既情況係一樣。
再多謝！:64:
原帖由 呂品器 於 11-4-2009 01:25 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
師兄：多謝提點先！
1.笨問題：我部傻瓜機得AiAF、中央對焦同臉部優先...咁即係揀中央對焦？:( 希望師兄唔好嘔血...細佬真係唔曉...
2.平時有用黑畫紙做底，上面幅野係求快所以冇用到，不過矇既情 ...
Bingo! 中央對焦, & remember focus on the 'head'
中央對焦 on head & 黑畫紙做底 (& all the steps mentioned previouslu) u will see the difference!post ur new pics to share ar!
[ 本帖最後由 Gundam@EFSF 於 11-4-2009 01:33 AM 編輯 ]
原帖由 KAMINA 於 10-4-2009 12:36 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
hi EFSF大大, 我一直都好鐘意你影gundam既手法
其實我覺得咁影唔難....你既教學都寫得好清楚好好.....但問題係我冇一棧夠力既燈:31:
屋企個19台燈打左落去同冇打都冇咩分別.....:31: :31: 諗起都把鬼火...
aiya... that exactly why I emphasize the function of tripod... try it & with +EV & u will see the differeence!
刪...試好d再post...
[ 本帖最後由 呂品器 於 11-4-2009 02:11 AM 編輯 ]