不過我都系第一次見鼻屎佬打咁多字∼∼∼:58:
回覆 2# 的文章
The painting ofmegahouse is better.CM's human body without armour is better since you can see a stick between the shoulder and body in megahouse's(from big big' pic only, maybe can adjust it)
Megahouse's human with armour is better. (Maybe posting problem, but you can see the "neck" for megahouse's)
I like the CM's vehicle since it seems to have better shape.
I bought CM's stick type even it is smaller, worse painting and not so good shape for human with armour. Since Megahouse's have a critical dead point.....
The ratio between the human and the vehicle is bad. The vehicle is too small (or just a little bit but small enough to be a problem.) Every time I saw the offical pics of riding on a vehicle, it just look like an adult playing toy car..... It is too critical. No matter how good it is, I immediately rejected Megahouse when I saw that pic.
If any big big don't agree that the vehicle of megahouse has a bad scale, please let me know by showing some pics of "riding". I may rush to buy back megahouse's. Scaling problem is the only reason to stop me from buying it at that time. (now are scaling problem and money problem....)
[ 本帖最後由 JohnChief 於 18-10-2008 05:19 PM 編輯 ] 原帖由 mr.elljay 於 18-10-2008 02:49 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
贊∼∼！
不過我都系第一次見鼻屎佬打咁多字∼∼∼:58:
乜大大你成日mon住我架咩?http://forum1.hkgolden.com/faces/sosad.gif 原帖由 JohnChief 於 18-10-2008 05:13 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
The painting ofmegahouse is better.
CM's human body without armour is better since you can see a stick between the shoulder and body in megahouse's(from big big' pic only, maybe can adjust it)
M ...
如果要比較人同車比例的話, 兩間廠都有"大人騎玩具車"既感覺~ 有時間會再影d相上黎俾大家比較一下。 好正既比較 i support megahouse :43: megahouse:D