不好意思那最後如果
gf1 or ep2 呢??
neweasonlss 發表於 6-6-2010 01:32 AM http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
亂入...
Panasonic GF1 無機身防震... 咁... 閣下認為邊部優勢大啲？...
呵呵呵...
小櫻上
不好意思那最後如果
gf1 or ep2 呢??
neweasonlss 發表於 6-6-2010 01:32 AM http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
GF1 iso control 差, PQ 差, noise 怪異 , 無防震,無 art filter ,手感差唔好揸影一陣手指抽筋,舊產物早應大大減價,mon靚(不過個人唔認為係優點,抄落電腦唔保證張相有機睇咁靚) 如果唔係水價非常唔值得購買
GF1 iso control 差, PQ 差, noise 怪異 , 無防震,無 art filter ,手感差唔好揸影一陣手指抽筋,舊 ...
shawn 發表於 6-6-2010 01:49 AM http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
thanks i think i will buy ep2!!!
我都係比較緊GF1 同EPL1。
GF1 iso control 差, ← 即係點唔係好明？ PQ 差, ← 係Ｄ乜嚟？有咩作用？
noise 怪異 , ← 係高感光時？ 無art filter,←係咪場景模式嗰Ｄ？
手感差唔好揸影一陣手指抽筋,← 我試揸過反而ＯＫ
舊產物早應大大減價 ← 同意！仲好貴,同EPL1比 GF1mon靚同大、GF1 made in Japan ,
我自己個人覺得EPL1差在個Mon细同色差, 機身膠感重,好似好化學易壞咁..如果個Mon 整返大Ｄ己入手了..
GF1 好多人話影出嚟的相較冷無EPL1咁鲜明、但快門好Ｄ、日本制、机身質感同餅鏡較好
P.S Shawn 你影Ｄ相好靚！
eGF1 iso control 差, PQ 差, noise 怪異 , 無防震,無 art filter,手感差唔好揸影一陣手指抽筋,舊產物早應大大減價,mon靚(不過個人唔認為係優點,抄落電腦唔保證張相有機睇咁靚) 如果唔係水價非常唔值得購買
shawn 發表於 6-6-2010 01:49 AM http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
啱啱天氣好,測試一下枝 panasonic 45-200 , 成像還是相當不錯的:61:
om 9-18 @ 9mm
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6037948p1.jpg
(中央部份) pan 45-200 @ 200mm
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6037974p1.jpg
pan 20/1.7:35:
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6017882fb.jpg
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6017836fb.jpg
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6017885fb.jpg
喜愛對角魚,期待 panasonic 8/3.5:handshake:
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6038075afb3.jpg
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6038103afb3.jpg
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6038101afb3.jpg
http://i818.photobucket.com/albums/zz105/fung00231/P6038100afb3.jpg
我都係比較緊GF1 同EPL1。
GF1 iso control 差, ← 即係點唔係好明？ PQ 差, ← 係Ｄ乜Ý ...
taken 發表於 6-6-2010 11:22 AM http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
PQ... 應該係 Price Quality... 價格/性能 比... 卦...
以GF2接近EP1/EP2嘅價錢... 雖則有內置閃燈... 但就無好似平過佢嘅E-PL1嘅引閃功能...
至於支 20/F1.7... 總之係M4/3 Mount 就用到... 唔一定要買GF1...
preview mon 大唔代表影嘅相會好啲... 只係令用家感覺良好...
不過睇閣下所寫嘅嘢... 點睇都覺得你比較鍾情部GF1...
其實買邊部都無所謂... 部部相機都可以影到靚相... 自己用得開心就得...
小櫻上
yes i Like GF1 more d but the price still High...
anyway thx
PQ 其實係 picture quality , 泛指畫汁:love:
旅行問 fd 借多個 body , 一睇新簇簇好似尋日買咁新,如果花咗都唔知點算:Q
睇吓銀色夾鏡多啲定白機:p
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_7985fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_7988afb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_7989fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_7992fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_7995fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_7997fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_7998fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_8001fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_8002fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_8003fb1.jpg
http://i914.photobucket.com/albums/ac349/fung00232/IMG_8006fb1.jpg
回復 204# taken
反正GF1個價都仲高,等埋$ONY正式出貨先考慮啦.
再者可以睇睇C,N兩間廠有乜新消息, 多個選擇好D.
仲有仲有,江湖流傳GF2的設計都幾吸引,等下無壊.
我部舊機A/P/M mode 己壞用唔到、得返Auto 同場景無事。
Sony Nex 的評論中10個人有7個話差...雖然個可動Mon超正、但怕得個外表影出嚟仲差過普通DC...我睇過日本Ｄ sample pics 麻麻乍
有人傳九月出LX4、唔知有無GF2 、希望有多Ｄ消息、無就今個月內出新機。
另外想問panasonic LUMIX G 20mm / F1.7
http://www.dcfever.com/media/lens/images/2009/panasonic_20_1_7_m.jpg
Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm f2.8
http://www.dcfever.com/media/lens/images/2009/om_m17_m.jpg
哩2塊鏡邊款好Ｄ？無玩開相機太多問題見諒:35:
好毒呀Ｄ相引死人:63:
PQ 其實係 picture quality , 泛指畫汁
旅行問 fd 借多個 body , 一睇新簇簇好似尋日買咁新,如果花 ...
shawn 發表於 8-6-2010 01:12 PM http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
相機嘢真係無限可能,突然醒起上年買 lensbaby 有 promote 送 wide macro kit adaptor ,即刻去鴨記買個 40.5mm --> 37mm step down ring 試吓效果:DD
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/IMG_8008fb1.jpg
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/IMG_8009fb1.jpg
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/IMG_8012fb1.jpg
A: mzd 14-42 kit lens 最近對焦
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/P6098676fb1.jpg
B: 有加 macro filter
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/P6098690fb1.jpg
A
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/P6098678fb1.jpg
B
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/P6098686fb1.jpg
A
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/P6098680fb1.jpg
B
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/P6098696fb1.jpg
中央勁 sharp , 四邊有畫質下降懷疑,不過唔肯定係 dof cover 唔到定點,下次試吓落腳收22光圈睇吓:shiny:
最後post多一個銀,圖案幾靚:D
http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad170/fung00233/P6098736fb1.jpg
回復 207# taken
建議你帶張咭去相機舖試下影幾張相先,試下手感,之後回家在電腦上比較一下相片先決定買邊一部.每人口味唔同,好難話邊一部一定好D.不過有比較就易感覺到了.
我就是比呢幾位大人的毒相毒左買E-PL1的........
鏡頭方面如果你之前多數用開DC的,咁我建議你第一支鏡先唔好考慮買定焦的.
如果是考慮作為第二支的咁,我稍為建議17 F2.8的.
其實兩支各有各吸引的地方,不過20MM稍為有點不足,而1.7光圈淺景深當然吸引,但淺景深可是雙面刃呀,要用得好需要一定的經驗.
17MM用在M4/3就是34MM,同人單眼睇野時的視角差不多,亦即是較易我手影我睇了,比較好用.