Toys with FX 55 vs D90
Just browsed thru some of my old pics.Discovered that FX55 and basic DSLR like D90 do so differently.
=>>same light source and background.
Photoshop for auto contrst an level adjustment.
=>>
Shutter speed, Aparture and ISO really determine the outcome of photos, esp. macro photos.:73:
I must learn more in these.:78:
Gaiking the Great face Open version
Fx 55
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3618/3420565877_73a9bd5804_o.jpg
D90
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3381/3600348197_6dbe548656_b.jpg
SHE Godannar Triple drive mode
FX 55
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2308/2538973096_3b6c8fb07f_o.jpg
D90
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3604/3601160194_934a30221b_b.jpg
MAX Godannar
FX 55
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2291/2527628711_f1046439a1_o.jpg
D90
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3638/3601160010_45c2eeed2a_b.jpg
[ 本帖最後由 genesicgaogaiga 於 7-6-2009 02:32 PM 編輯 ] :71: really great shots, brother GGGG!
:58: indeed, i would rather think that the difference in output quality is solely contributed by better optics (i.e. lens) and image sensor (large area, high signal to noise ratio), which result into higher resolution and greater color depth.
:62: taking pics with same exposure settings (aperture opening, shutter speed and ISO) by these two types of camera won't yield image in comparable quality, that's what i believe in~
:77: i love reading your posts on the main board; so jealous that you can have so many great collections and photo taking skills! :73: to 4g 大師,
小弟手痕幫你做左個sample retouch, 如有問題可即del,
原圖
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2291/2527628711_f1046439a1_o.jpg
http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/1286/2527628711f1046439a1o.jpg
你覺得點?
我將個tone儘量扮到似你用d90影果張咁 原帖由 Noctilux 於 7-6-2009 04:15 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
to 4g 大師,
小弟手痕幫你做左個sample retouch, 如有問題可即del,
原圖
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2291/2527628711_f1046439a1_o.jpg
http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/1286/2527628711f1046439 ...
the problem is that simple DChas the problem of difficulty in focusing & depth adjustment. It is difficult to take pics in white light background with DC... 但係我覺得dslr仲難... 同dc比, 下下要企後d, 低炒高炒又怕手震, 成日要用腳,
其實而家好多dc都有小量手動function, 甚至可以影raw, 事後轉wb...
唯一比不上dslr就係dof, 不過... 影玩具影響不大...反而當你想全身都sharp的時候,
用dslr分分鐘收到f8以上, 用dc, 2.8就夠曬... 搞到dslr要開腳先夠穩.... 原帖由 Noctilux 於 7-6-2009 16:57 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
但係我覺得dslr仲難... 同dc比, 下下要企後d, 低炒高炒又怕手震, 成日要用腳,
其實而家好多dc都有小量手動function, 甚至可以影raw, 事後轉wb...
唯一比不上dslr就係dof, 不過... 影玩具影響不大...反而當你想全身 ...
Could you give me some example of such good DC?:77:
DSLR is good but you are correct in the sense that DSRL is a bit clumsy.
I need shutter cable and stand.
F8-11
But I don't need to stand back, I can even put my D90 as close as 10cm.
[ 本帖最後由 genesicgaogaiga 於 7-6-2009 10:23 PM 編輯 ] good dc... 對我來說影到相就是good....
不過如果想功能全面既, lx-3 真係有曬大部分功能,
平價dc的話, canon a系列不嬲都係入門學影相首選, 有PASM...
你支鏡的確係做到20CM 1:3 MACRO,
而且影玩具來說絕對夠曬...
都係果句, 係影玩具呢個topic上, 唯一要用到dslr, 就係dof... 原帖由 Noctilux 於 7-6-2009 23:50 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
good dc... 對我來說影到相就是good....
不過如果想功能全面既, lx-3 真係有曬大部分功能,
平價dc的話, canon a系列不嬲都係入門學影相首選, 有PASM...
你支鏡的確係做到20CM 1:3 MACRO,
而且影玩具來說絕對夠 ...
thank you for your reply.
I have learnt more from you. 原帖由 Noctilux 於 7-6-2009 23:50 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
good dc... 對我來說影到相就是good....
不過如果想功能全面既, lx-3 真係有曬大部分功能,
平價dc的話, canon a系列不嬲都係入門學影相首選, 有PASM...
你支鏡的確係做到20CM 1:3 MACRO,
而且影玩具來說絕對夠 ...
thank you for your reply.
I have learnt more from you. White balance setting有出入
D90偏藍，FX55一三偏黃
我買左D90之後都冇影過乜玩具相呀:63:
[ 本帖最後由 dlmc 於 10-6-2009 11:08 PM 編輯 ] 原帖由 dlmc 於 10-6-2009 23:00 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
White balance setting有出入
D90偏藍，FX55一三偏黃
我買左D90之後都冇影過乜玩具相呀:63:
You should try it out.
It will give you great pleasure. 原帖由 dlmc 於 10-6-2009 11:00 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
White balance setting有出入
D90偏藍，FX55一三偏黃
我買左D90之後都冇影過乜玩具相呀:63:
大大 white balance 點會係一個問題吖,影raw 你想要點冷點曖 tone 都無難度啦:58:
小弟閒時都有影吓玩具,不過無乜錢買玩具所以都係揀啲平嘢嚟買:80:
好耐之前朋友見到天琴$129幫我買埋:43:
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1315fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1386fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1424fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1403fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1417fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1494fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1511fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1515fb.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1554fb.jpg 原帖由 shawn 於 11-6-2009 13:56 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
大大 white balance 點會係一個問題吖,影raw 你想要點冷點曖 tone 都無難度啦:58:
小弟閒時都有影吓玩具,不過無乜錢買玩具所以都係揀啲平嘢嚟買:80:
好耐之前朋友見到天琴$12 ...
Nice pics.
Are you using light box orDIY setting with 2-03 lamps?
How about the ground? Black plastic board?? 原帖由 genesicgaogaiga 於 11-6-2009 02:24 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Nice pics.
Are you using light box orDIY setting with 2-03 lamps?
How about the ground? Black plastic board??
我懶到死無lightbox,淨係用580ex打bounce咁喳:62:
地下係用黑膠板:77: 原帖由 shawn 於 11-6-2009 01:56 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
小弟閒時都有影吓玩具,不過無乜錢買玩具所以都係揀啲平嘢嚟買:80:
好耐之前朋友見到天琴$129幫我買埋:43:
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc133/d2_beer/IMG_1315fb.jpg
85 1.2:71:
頁:
[1]
2