new toy pics with my new D90 +Zigma F2.8 18-50 macro EX
Justbought D90 and tried some new pics for comparison.Zigma F2.8, 18-50 macro
old FX 55
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1019/3174334336_0642c3d6f6_o.jpg
new D90
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3652/3428972873_8bca416ec6_o.jpg
old FX55
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2308/2538973096_3b6c8fb07f_o.jpg
new D90
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3644/3429787738_357a3795c4_o.jpg
Still not satisfied.
Any suggestion on the ISO setting, EV and focus.
new D90
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3318/3429735572_fbd2eb7583_o.jpg 我估是光線太接近或過強令照片不夠 sharp,大大再多試不同光線的拍法吧。:58: I will try other source of light.
Tried different aperture:
It seems that F2.8 is too much.
I changed the ISO to 200, F to 5.6 and EV to +1.
A little improvement.
old pic with FX55
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3051/2785477981_dd01e7c0fb_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3345/3430717391_267ea27b7c_o.jpg
BY the way, how can I make the white background less greyish?
EV was already increased and overadjustment would cause overexposure of the toy.
In addtion to light source, anything to adjust?? 原帖由 genesicgaogaiga 於 11-4-2009 08:52 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
I will try other source of light.
Tried different aperture:
It seems that F2.8 is too much.
I changed the ISO to 200, F to 5.6 and EV to +1.
A little improvement.
old pic with FX55
htt ...
主要都係lightsource , 同你需要一個攝影柵, 你會灰係因為有d 地方光有d 地方唔夠光, 光源唔平均搞到咁,
光圈方面2.8 景深太淺, 下次可以試下5.6 -11, 睇你手持定落腳, 落腳再收細d 都無坊, 原帖由 wilsont 於 12-4-2009 23:15 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif主要都係lightsource , 同你需要一個攝影柵, 你會灰係因為有d 地方光有d 地方唔夠光, 光源唔平均搞到咁,光圈方面2.8 景深太淺, 下次可以試下5.6 -11, 睇你手持定落腳, 落腳再收細d 都無坊, :71: agree
:73: wish brother genesicgaogaiga would share more pics soon!! 原帖由 wilsont 於 12-4-2009 23:15 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
主要都係lightsource , 同你需要一個攝影柵, 你會灰係因為有d 地方光有d 地方唔夠光, 光源唔平均搞到咁,
光圈方面2.8 景深太淺, 下次可以試下5.6 -11, 睇你手持定落腳, 落腳再收細d 都無坊,
Thanks for your suggestion.
So F5.6 -11 should be my combination.:64:
ISO 100-200 should be OK, I guess.
I actually used a lightbox but its design is different from ordinary one. The light is directly shinning from the top. I would buy a new on later, a ordinary soft lightbox with better lighting from 3 sides.
I hope that I can have some clear good pics.
:) 原帖由 genesicgaogaiga 於 13-4-2009 12:34 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Thanks for your suggestion.
So F5.6 -11 should be my combination.:64:
ISO 100-200 should be OK, I guess.
I actually used a lightbox but its design is different from ordinary one. The light ...
你仲可以試埋用飛燈係支閃係個lightbox 後面閃, 包你個背景夠曬白淨:he:
頁:
[1]