行過街見到疑似係年代久遠之物?:? :? :?
http://i591.photobucket.com/albums/ss359/holimw/140820091293.jpg
原帖由 S20081997 於 14-8-2009 11:29 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
:34: haha !! i means like focker 2 !! :34: , u ? i also like ,as a SDF-1 brother :71:
Of course I know la, but being a Macross SDF lover, I like Minmay, Misa more !!! :p :p
[ 本帖最後由 Godzima 於 14-8-2009 01:53 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 holimw 於 14-8-2009 12:09 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
I haven't got it!
I Never buy DX and only play vf-100's:x :x
coz they are small (allow me to display more) and cheap!:p :p
:71: :71: :71: :71:
原帖由 Shiro 於 14-8-2009 12:05 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Just curious, I would like to know how many brothers have purchased / ordered DX Armored VF-25S?I would like to do a little survey on how many people has them on hands and how do they like it.
Fo ...
Just got mine last night.Lazy, so try to adopt Brother Lui Lui's answer:64:with modifications (in blue below):
1) QC -- 3 (DX都得咁既質素？可能我玩慣左Yamato) 6 (many 水口, and got a hair on the yellow painting on my plane!:no: )
2) Overall playability - 6 (唔上armor parts時都OK，但上左就唔洗郁...)4 only. Totally agreed.Cannot fully enjoy by playing the toy (e.g. my favourite "Wu...Wu...Wu...":42: ).In my case, the hip joint and the lock at the waist of 25S Battroid mode are not strong (tight) enough.It often bends backward after putting on the armor packs on the wings.:31: So I don't dare to transform it.
3) Value (in terms of the price being reasonable to you or not) - 7 (我覺得又唔係貴啵...尤其是當你之前買過個fold booster set既時候！:angry: ) Also 7.
4) Weight - 重 d 對我既講冇咩重要性...又或者太重唔容易handle添 話哂呢隻野要變 Agreed.
5) How many other DX do you have?- 其他3隻all except RVF-25:70:
and
6) Do you regret that you bought it? - 買開DX既，就入硬架喇...DX限制下，唔計QC我覺得設計都交足功課架喇...Yes, a bit regret (I might have been happier if buy Yamato's planes instead:43: )....but as I wish to collect and play larger completed MF planes, so no alternatives.
7) Will you keep it or not? - 又唔會dump下嘛...:(Yes, because I find it too troublesome for me to sell it.By the way, I have killed the box.
巴打唔問下外型果d既...？:?
查實以DX計(天生粗大)，外型算幾好架喇...下下同模型比就一定係模型靚
In my opinion, the curves of the plane could have been made better (sorry, I am plane lover).In this regard, Yamato's planes surely win.:$
I'll say that this kit is "not bad", but is not so recommended, unless you really want to collect a finished and large MF toy like me.
:64:
[ 本帖最後由 F-14 於 14-8-2009 02:10 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 humanspider 於 14-8-2009 11:56 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
聖鬥士成16XXX 頁:unhappy: :34: pls dont mind . seiya n macross is difference ma :34:
原帖由 F-14 於 14-8-2009 02:07 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
I'll say that this kit is "not bad", but is not so recommended, unless you really want to collect a finished and large MF toy like me.
好同意...
又唔係話垃圾，又唔係強烈推薦咁啦。:(
如果比Yamato出...我相信真係模型都比下去少少...
幻想姐，講咩都得:p
原帖由 holimw 於 14-8-2009 01:31 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
行過街見到疑似係年代久遠之物?:? :? :?
http://i591.photobucket.com/albums/ss359/holimw/140820091293.jpg :Q brother BlaceAce have :p
原帖由 呂品器 於 14-8-2009 02:19 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
好同意...
又唔係話垃圾，又唔係強烈推薦咁啦。:(
如果比Yamato出...我相信真係模型都比下去少少...
幻想姐，講咩都得:p
YAMATO 冇 M7 MF 版權, 唔係既話MACROSS 可能係 YAMAMTO 個仔了
好似高達係BANDAI 個仔
原帖由 呂品器 於 14-8-2009 02:19 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
好同意...
又唔係話垃圾，又唔係強烈推薦咁啦。:(
如果比Yamato出...我相信真係模型都比下去少少...
幻想姐，講咩都得:p
Actually, I am looking at my Yamato's VF-0A when writing the comments above.You know what I feel.:55:
To be fair to Bandai, I am also unsure that whether Yamato could handle such a project with quite complicated design/armor parts.But at least, the "dry" planes, if produced by Yamato, should be better I believe.:64:
(still 899:what: )
[ 本帖最後由 F-14 於 14-8-2009 02:35 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 humanspider 於 14-8-2009 02:30 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
YAMATO 冇 M7 MF 版權, 唔係既話MACROSS 可能係 YAMAMTO 個仔了
好似高達係BANDAI 個仔
MF就黎緊5年都唔洗諗...
M7呢...好大機會Yamato已經拎倒拉臣 :p
VF-22S Gamlin機貼紙，上面已經有麥斯米娜個名...M&M機只係M7出現過
(VF-22S Gamlin機雖然已出，但只係OVA，未能肯定Yamato係可以出哂TV版d機)
老實講，M7 好多機設我都麻麻... (兩個男主角既機我都唔覺靚...) 不過Yamato出，我又應該會捧下場...
原帖由 F-14 於 14-8-2009 02:34 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
To be fair to Bandai, I am also unsure that whether Yamato could handle such a project with quite complicated design/armor parts.But at least, the "dry" planes, if produced by Yamato, should be better I believe.
師兄有冇YF-19同SV-51？
呢兩部同VF-25變型比較似...YF-19仲係冇用CAD設計，我覺得都出得幾靚仔...唔同VF-25設定時，已經肯定立體化係work既...:64:
又係果句，你睇下Bandai MF模型，就知道實際上係做倒既！DX點解搞成咁？:31:
頂一頂．．．９００:34:
重未得．．．
頂多野．．９００
原帖由 呂品器 於 14-8-2009 02:39 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
師兄有冇YF-19同SV-51？
呢兩部同VF-25變型比較似...YF-19仲係冇用CAD設計，我覺得都出得幾靚仔...唔同VF-25設定時，已經肯定立體化係work既...:64:
又係果句，你睇下Bandai MF模型，就知道實際上係做倒 ...
CHing, curious to know when (which plane) does Yamato firstly use CAD? :64:
:64:
:64:
:64:
:p
[ 本帖最後由 F-14 於 14-8-2009 02:58 PM 編輯 ]