聽日出去買番個先......我想問個架大約幾錢??? :shy:
$35~$49不等。 原帖由 kkchoy 於 7-6-2008 04:52 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
聽日出去買番個先......我想問個架大約幾錢??? :shy:
我o係葵芳買29一個~~~ 原帖由 Tachikoma 於 7-6-2008 01:21 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
請教衆死士 知否D 羅絲可在那裏購買 我行左十幾間五金都話無禁細的 THX!:64:
Tachikoma bigbig, I suggest that you may go to supermxx and ask Uncle Ming to help you to contact halfeye for extra screw. 原帖由 kampferms18 於 8-6-2008 12:20 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Tachikoma bigbig, I suggest that you may go to supermxx and ask Uncle Ming to help you to contact halfeye for extra screw.
This may be the only solution.:38:
My review on CYBASTER
Since I was busying at some family matters, I could only have time to write a report today.Box Art:
Similar to all complete change series.
Large box size.
One layer of sponge package only.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3113/2561047837_cbde33d30a_o.jpg
Only a cybaster in bird form, a bird form stand, 2 small attack robots, 2 limited attack robots, 3 extrahands and one sword.
No stand for humanoid form.
=>>BUY IT YOURSELF.
That's important.
Many of those who have bought it should understand my meaning.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3132/2561950158_3eacf4571d_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/2561048945_e506fdfbf5_o.jpg
Paint and built:
Paint is superb. No criticizing point at all.
The metallic purple is great.
The pearl gray resin is very nice too.
It is even better than the D. Nova.:71:
The shape is OK to me. Someone may thick that it is too muscular, but I feel OK.
Movement:
Range of movement is up to standard. It can perform most of the Cybaster's poses.:43:
Transformation :
Easy as compared to Grungust. D. Nova is far more difficult than it.
The first stock has problem in scratching the green ball at the waist area. This stock seemed to have new ball with colored resin ( I guessed). Besides there is no parts which will scratch it if you are following the instructions. So you will not need to worry about the playing.
Why should it be much expensive than Grungust??:?
Special points
As compared to other SHE toys, this one is quite unique.
Nearly all the armor can be opened and you can then adjust the tightness of the screws. The instruction notes also teach you the way to open these armor parts. This is never seen in prev. series.
Limited items:
The limited "attack robots" have small movable joints, mouths and wings are mobile.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3097/2561048597_a71d69fc68_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3116/2561048753_9cb848bbb3_o.jpg
Several disappointing points:
1. The joints of waist and legs are not strong enough to hold the humanoid form steadily.
Since the wings are really too heavy, this is a tendency for the cybaster to bend backwards.
Even if you tighten the joints, it may still occur. Many of us have used Gundam display stand for support. But the is too large for usage. Though SHE will release an official stand soon, I built a custom made for it.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3139/2561871246_e7289659dc_o.jpg
2. Opening of armor is good, but they are a little bit to loose in some area.
Due to the weight of wings, the screws may face a lot of stress and they may become loosen after a period of time, soa display support stand is definitely needed.
Now my FINAL PICS.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3164/2561049057_e3045ab6ba_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3139/2561872076_ce517b0130_o.jpg
Conclusion
SHE has succeeded in building a great Cybaster. It is the only one in the world at the present moment which can undergo complete transformation. The painting and shape is also good. But the weight of wings may kill it, so a display stand of some form is definitely needed.
If you can have a stand, it is a must for all SRW fans!!:71::71:
原帖由 genesicgaogaiga 於 9-6-2008 02:08 AM 發表
Why should it be much expensive than Grungust??:?
4G大終於出report，Cybaster大可以開盒喇。
同轟格殊相比，Cybaster體積係較為大，不過論變形複雜呈度，就剛好相反，所以真係唔知佢以咩標準黎定個價錢？
4G大，你隻Cybird形態其實仲可以set得再好的。
Btw專用台座一定買！:71: 原帖由 kampferms18 於 8-6-2008 12:20 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Tachikoma bigbig, I suggest that you may go to supermxx and ask Uncle Ming to help you to contact halfeye for extra screw. THX!:77: 原帖由 genesicgaogaiga 於 9-6-2008 02:08 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
Since I was busying at some family matters, I could only have time to write a report today.
Box Art:
Similar to all complete change series.
Large box size.
One layer of sponge package only.
ht ...
u've done a good job :71: 原帖由 迷人超 於 9-6-2008 02:24 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
4G大終於出report，Cybaster大可以開盒喇。
同轟格殊相比，Cybaster體積係較為大，不過論變形複雜呈度，就剛好相反，所以真係唔知佢以咩標準黎定個價錢？
4G大，你隻Cybird形態其實仲可以set得再好的。
Btw專用 ...
我唯一一隻half eye 既玩具:43: 原帖由 迷人超 於 9-6-2008 02:24 AM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
4G大終於出report，Cybaster大可以開盒喇。
同轟格殊相比，Cybaster體積係較為大，不過論變形複雜呈度，就剛好相反，所以真係唔知佢以咩標準黎定個價錢？
4G大，你隻Cybird形態其實仲可以set得再好的。
Btw專用 ...
就算係大隻左都好﹐隻cybaster始終都係貴……
明明部轟就複雜D﹐點解反而會平左既呢﹖唔通日本o個邊D膠料貴左o甘多﹖:time: 原帖由 gundamrx782 於 9-6-2008 12:37 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
就算係大隻左都好﹐隻cybaster始終都係貴……
明明部轟就複雜D﹐點解反而會平左既呢﹖唔通日本o個邊D膠料貴左o甘多﹖:time:
岩岩返溫6月號電擊Hobby......
原來"Familia"係1996年超級任天堂卡匣遊戲，超級機械人大戰外傳---"魔裝機神The Lord of Elemental"入面，Cybaster既初期裝備黎；而"Hi Familia"就係"Familia"既強化型。:36: 原帖由 迷人超 於 9-6-2008 05:25 PM 發表 http://www.toysdaily.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif
岩岩返溫6月號電擊Hobby......
原來"Familia"係1996年超級任天堂卡匣遊戲，超級機械人大戰外傳---"魔裝機神The Lord of Elemental"入面，Cybaster既初期裝備黎；而"Hi Familia"就係"Familia"既強化型。:36:
原來係o甘~~
唔怪得無人知道究竟係o羊來啦~~~:x