Xenon 發表於 18-1-2015 17:40:43

gazza1211 發表於 18-1-2015 11:04 AM
咦,看實物比較 saber 2.0 還不錯,不過,高了一個頭,我就不買了。。。因為跟其他戰隊saber會身高不一致 ...

其實高度差E個問題而經無想像中咁嚴重了....
MIKU 1.0 同 2.0 真係好誇張...{:1_372:}
而舊吾王佢地都有高度差, 就好似吾王EXTRA 同吾王1.0, 所以有身高不一致我都照入了...

GAZZA兄你會買吾王 DRESS VER 嗎?? 如無意外, 佢應該都同2.0一樣高....

Xenon 發表於 18-1-2015 17:43:00

本帖最後由 Xenon 於 18-1-2015 09:15 PM 編輯

fktuen 發表於 18-1-2015 12:03 PM
I still prefer the 1.0 joints....

See, they have to make the figure this big to have a good mat ...
Now I finally know why the 2.0 body is generally bigger than that of 1.0:(

I also prefer 1.0 joint more, especially the hand joint, for current SHF-like hand joint, it is really fussy to change:cool:

leungpak 發表於 18-1-2015 17:44:19

啱啱入哂素子同saber2.0, 係無揀既情況之下QC都好好;
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a119/leungpakhin/Mobile%20Uploads/image.jpg

暫時拆左隻素子黎玩, 好誘人好有型,
有兩個胸換, 類似強殖裝甲咁一大一細, 不過換件果時個畫面會好糟糕XDD
但係有個小問題, 就係裝上巨乳(喂)果時好容易跌落黎,
反而裝細d果個就好實淨。
唔知有無其他人有同樣情況?

Xenon 發表於 18-1-2015 17:46:41


上星期執好書櫃, 終於有一D 位可以DISPLAY:)

諗左好耐, 決定DISPLAY E九位千金, 咁多位CHING知唔知佢地有咩共通點?:shy:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-0U0ZvvEhJxk/VLt-CsFx1-I/AAAAAAAAA_k/w6tHTqAe98I/w958-h540-no/P1189893.JPG

小小玩具迷 發表於 18-1-2015 17:53:39

Xenon 發表於 18-1-2015 05:46 PM
上星期執好書櫃, 終於有一D 位可以DISPLAY

諗左好耐, 決定DISPLAY E九位千金, 咁多位CHING知唔知佢 ...

都是女????{:1_215:}

床上的波兒 發表於 18-1-2015 19:13:16

leungpak

gazza1211 發表於 18-1-2015 20:30:19

Xenon 發表於 18-1-2015 05:46 PM
上星期執好書櫃, 終於有一D 位可以DISPLAY

諗左好耐, 決定DISPLAY E九位千金, 咁多位CHING知唔知佢 ...

都穿裙??。。。。。。。都有散貨???:x

gazza1211 發表於 18-1-2015 20:38:31

Xenon 發表於 18-1-2015 05:40 PM
其實高度差E個問題而經無想像中咁嚴重了....
MIKU 1.0 同 2.0 真係好誇張...
而舊吾王佢地都 ...

有日網review了。比例看起來不太嚴重,跟其他Saber戰隊成員一起企應該唔太怪。Xenon兄有沒有買,我就一個問題,就是新版和舊版的面部parts,可不可以互用??
http://blog.livedoor.jp/hacchaka/archives/51939432.html
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/hacchaka/imgs/d/4/d4ac8601.jpg
http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/hacchaka/imgs/c/8/c839939d.jpg

revy 發表於 18-1-2015 21:22:07

五十鈴華今日都入,唔該哂師兄

fktuen 發表於 18-1-2015 23:11:04

Xenon 發表於 18-1-2015 05:43 PM
Now I finally know why the 2.0 body is generally bigger than that of 1.0

I also prefer 1.0 jo ...

can't agree more!
the 2.0 wrist joints sucks big time! especially on the look of it!
coz the 1.0 wrist joints fit way better with female figure, it's more cute, plus, it looks more natural.

Xenon 發表於 19-1-2015 00:31:52

小小玩具迷 發表於 18-1-2015 05:53 PM
都是女????

gazza1211 發表於 18-1-2015 08:30 PM
都穿裙??。。。。。。。都有散貨???


Gazza 兄同小玩CHING都估中小小:)

其實佢地共通點係JK, Joshi kougosei 女子高中生 (吾王1.0除外):shy:

佢地全部都係著日式水手服校服, 全都有蝴蝶結同MINI DRESS, 每朝起身見到既風景好正的:shy:

Xenon 發表於 19-1-2015 00:43:11

gazza1211 發表於 18-1-2015 08:38 PM
有日網review了。比例看起來不太嚴重,跟其他Saber戰隊成員一起企應該唔太怪。Xenon兄有沒有買,我就一個 ...

可能我琴晚是但快影, 角度問題先有咁大高度差:(

答番GAZZA兄你個問題, 頭先我試過了, 2.0可以用1.0 面相, 但1.0用唔到2.0
而2.0用1.0後, 不過因為面形關係(額頭太窄), 條頸會變得睇唔到

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-hKWMNbfkzgs/VLvdZX4qMNI/AAAAAAAABBg/Q35eNWtzz58/w439-h585-no/P1189905.JPG

為左毒GAZZA兄, 我再影一影吾王最出名既仁王企:he:

─問おう。貴方が、私のマスターか

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-uiPcxxkwQmo/VLvda8pduMI/AAAAAAAABBw/pG1Lw2gSvvQ/w439-h585-no/P1189910.JPG

1.0 VER

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-MKzTRnrFCs4/VLvdXaxXvbI/AAAAAAAABB0/2ro-YWDHNMk/w439-h585-no/P1189903.JPG

比較

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-L1WC6o_lMwo/VLvdbu9aa3I/AAAAAAAABB4/6dMLRe74r2k/w439-h585-no/P1189911.JPG

Xenon 發表於 19-1-2015 00:47:33

fktuen 發表於 18-1-2015 11:11 PM
can't agree more!
the 2.0 wrist joints sucks big time! especially on the look of it!
coz the 1.0 ...

I think the most useful one of these 2.0 wrist joint is for the MIKASAミカサ・アッカーマン to make her famous salute pose, for the other figma, these joint do not improve much...

Can we stress on Figma to use the 1.0 joints??:die:

threeeye914 發表於 19-1-2015 09:45:09

toysdaily_login 發表於 17-1-2015 03:31 PM
有水貼跟??????..............................

係...有水貼...但我唔想有, 想佢現成貼埋~

谷村桐人 發表於 19-1-2015 09:57:48

想問你地有冇人係奸笑公司訂左Saber 收到發貨通知未?
頁: 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 [167] 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176
查看完整版本: FIGMA 分享會